UMN CDMS Wiki archive
start › cdms › k100 › run_summary › run_62 › calibration_0v_with_shield

Cuts applied to remove randoms, remove muon tails, and threshold cut to remove noise triggers

pTotal Integral Spectra, 1-sided 0-volt data
Blue = no external source, no shield
Red = Ba source, no shield
Green = no external source, shield

no apparent lines, 60 keV or otherwise, in above spectra

pTotal Integral Spectra, 1-sided 0-volt data
Normalized to peak of “hump”
Blue = no external source, no shield
Red = Ba source, no shield
Green = no external source, shield
pTotal Integral Spectra, 1-sided 0-volt data
Normalized to event rate
Blue = no external source, no shield
Red = Ba source, no shield
Green = no external source, shield
pTotal Integral Spectrum, with shield, 1-sided 0-volt data

with HV#2, the hump peak was around 115-120 keV. The hint of a peak near 0.028 is around the right place for 60 keV.

pTotal OF amplitude versus pTotal Integral

above plot shows that OF amplitude quickly stops working when the integral exceeds around 0.01

Events with pTotal Integral = 0.005
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.010
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.015
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.020
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.030
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.040
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.050
Events with pTotal Integral = 0.060
Event with pTotal Integral = 0.080
red = Side1pA (not used); magenta = Side1pB; blue = Side1pC; dark blue = Side1pD; darker blue = Side1pE; green = Side1pF

The above plots show that the dP/dI are not very balanced between the channels: pC and pE are always higher than the others.

At integrals as low as 0.01 there are already clear indications of TES saturation, which probably results in poor OF fits. At integrals of 0.03 and above, at least one channel is also showing ADC saturation, which will skew the integral quantities.

Tailfit Amplitude Spectrum, 1-sided 0-volt data
Above is a spectrum based on the sum of tail-fit amplitudes.
The two highest (most saturated) channels are omitted.
Peak near 2.4e-6 is probably 60 keV.
pB Tailfit Amplitude Spectrum, 1-sided 0-volt data
Peak in pB tailfit alone is perhaps stronger
pB Tailfit Amplitude versus Integral Amplitude
Tailfit amplitude is probably more sensitive than integral
pB Tailfit Amplitude with approximate keV calibration
pB Tailfit Amplitude with approximate keV calibration
pB OF Amplitude versus Tailfit Amplitude
pB Calibrated Tailfit Amplitude at Low Energy
no threshold cut
green = not random
blue = random
Noise wall seems quite low, below 1 keV
Comparing spectra of GeHV#2 to SiHV#4
Green = GeHV#2
Blue = SiHV#4

Both spectra have been calibrated to keV based on line identifications.
Not clear that the Si spectrum is correct.
Energy absorbed in the TESs
Spectrum in terms of absolute energy (in keV) absorbed in the 5 connected channels
The previously IDed 60keV line makes no sense - the absorbed energy is around 120 keV
57Co calibration
The excess from 57Co versus background is at the far left of the full spectrum. Right image zooms in on 120 keV peak and Compton peak.
Approximate calibrated 57Co spectrum
Ptotal Integral spectrum using 57Co to calibrate to keV
Approximate calibrated background spectrum, looking for 60keV peak
Red = Ptotal Integral spectrum calibrated to keV
Blue = Ptotal OF spectrum calibrated to keV

Now the 60keV peak is visible, particularly in the OF spectrum
pB (second ring) phonon collection efficiency
pC phonon collection efficiency pD phonon collection efficiency pE phonon collection efficiency
pF (inner) phonon collection efficiency
pTotal (5 channels) phonon collection efficiency
pF energy partition
Note region near 60keV with extra-high pF partition.
this may be events from Am
OF spectrum with high-pF-partition selection
Blue = restrictive cut, pFpart 0.24 to 0.30
Red = nonrestrictive cut, pFpart > 0.24

Click here for non-zero bias analysis