| | We'll trigger on a more sensitive channel, DCRC1pB, try 15 threshold. That's the second ring channel. |
| 1007 | Start a sequence 1-hour series of 90V data with Frontend Gain = 5, OG = 2, DCRC3pB intentionally railed, with 1000 beginning randoms, with no flashing in between series, and a 15ADC bin threshold trigger on DCRC1 pB. |
| 1015 | After randoms, there seem to be no triggers. I think I know why - Anthony disabled triggering from DCRC1 for some reason. Will have to fix that. For now will try triggering with DCRC3. |
| 1018 | Stop sequence |
| 1020 | Start a sequence 1-hour series of 90V data with Frontend Gain = 5, OG = 2, DCRC3pB intentionally railed, with 1000 beginning randoms, with no flashing in between series, and a 15ADC bin threshold trigger on DCRC3 pC. |
| 1032 | Data looks OK but trigger seems too high, would like to get smaller pulses. Adjust DCRC3pC trigger threshold down to 12. |
| 1041 | Trigger still seems too high. Adjust DCRC3pC trigger threshold down to 9. |
| 1058 | Trigger still seems too high. Adjust DCRC3pC trigger threshold down to 6. |
| 1110 | Current triggering level seems OK, but DCRC3pC has some double pulse shapes, so we tend to get two triggers. Not great. Meanwhile Anthony says that he has reenabled DCRC1 triggering. So we'll stop this run and trigger on DCRC1pB (which is Side1pB, the second ring). |
| 1115 | Start a sequence 1-hour series of 90V data with Frontend Gain = 5, OG = 2, DCRC3pB intentionally railed, with 1000 beginning randoms, with no flashing in between series, and a 10ADC bin threshold trigger on DCRC1 pB. |
| 1120 | Triggering is not working. When I turn the DCRC3pC trigger back on, it starts triggering again. |
| 1123 | Go back to triggering on DCRC3pC with threshold = 6. Now it's the same configuration as with the (end of the) _1020 series. |
| 1131 | Tower/MC/Coldplate = 33.1/35.8/216 mK, Still = 1.20 K / 110 μbar, G1/G2 = 190/175 mbar, 1K Pot = 1.67 K / 24 mbar. MB = 68.2%. Boil off rate: pretty close to slow mode. |
| 1145 | Anthony told me that we need to restart the triggerfe2 program in order to reenable DCRC1 for triggering. So we'll stop this sequence and try that. |
| 1147 | Stop data sequence |
| 1150 | Stop triggerfe2, towerfe3, and dcrc_driver programs, then restart them |
| 1149 | Start a sequence 1-hour series of 90V data with Frontend Gain = 5, OG = 2, DCRC3pB intentionally railed, with 1000 beginning randoms, with no flashing in between series, and a 10ADC bin threshold trigger on DCRC1 pB. |
| 1439 | Stop data |
| 1440 | HV = 90.0 V, Vtest = 11.2 mV → Vdetector = 85.1 V |
| 1455 | Finish microIbIs measurement. The Vbias values are on average 85 mV higher than earlier today at 0V, except that DCRC3pD is an outlier at 570 mV higher than earlier today. |
| 1500 | Dial HV down to 0V.
Checking Vtest after dialing down to 0V shows -75 mV but falling, so I guess something is discharging. DCRC3 channels are still pretty ugly. |
| 1510 | Vtest down to around -4 V. DCRC3pC pulses still pretty bad (at standard QET bias = 165), pretty big 10kHz oscillations. DCRC3pD pulses also still bad. |
| 1525 | Finish microIbIs measurement. DCRC1 Vbias values are lower than they were at 0V earlier today, by 10-20 mV. But DCRC3pC is the same as earlier, and DCRC3pD is 575 mV higher, i.e. the same as it was at 90V. It seems to be semi-permanently messed up. |
| 1530 | Flash detector for 30 s |
| 1555 | Tower has cooled to 33.6 mK. Now DCRC3pC is in strong 10kHz oscillation, but pulses look mostly OK. DCRC3pD shows no pulses at the moment. Snapping DCRC3pD brings pulses back but many are distorted. Then after a few minutes the pulses are gone completely again. It's a mess… |
| 1629 | Double check SQUID settings, they seem to be the same ones we've been using successfully for HV up to now. Snapping DCRC PC/D and slowly bringing QET bias back down brings back pulses, but many look monstrous. DCRC3PC seems to have a little 10kHz in it still too. |
| 1715 | After ZAPping the SQUIDs, all channels look ok again after restoring settings, except the two DCRC3 channels pC and pD seemed to fall into s/c at their standard QET biases but they are ok at 5 uA higher (pC/D = 170/207). |
| 1720 | Fill LN2 cold trap full. |