UMN CDMS Wiki archive
start › cdms › k100 › run_diary › 20160510

2016/05/10 (Tuesday)

Previous Day

Setup: HV mode, DIB1/2/3 → -/Switchboard PA&PB QET bias&ret off/Open → cables → 3.2MHz Filters → HV board → HV1/HV2 → DCRC55(1)/50(3), DCRCs on overnight
Tower temperature stable overnight
0907 Tower/MC/Coldplate =48.0/45.0/290 mK, Still = 1.13 K / 0.080 mbar, G1/G2 = 112/111 mbar, 1K Pot = 1.19 K / 2.0 mbar, Main Bath = 75.6%
0910 Fill LN2 cold trap bath
1050 Plug in only DIB2 to the EBox and repower DCRCs. Before zapping SQUIDs we see pulses on HV2 pD, and some strangely triggered pulses on HV2 pC. Zap SQUIDs.
1055 After zapping SQUIDs, all channels railed, but not at ±1.25 like normal. Currently HV2 pC & pD are railed at -0.08V. Relocking does nothing. Attempt to change Driver Offset and see if that helps.
1100 Changing Driver Offset has no effect. Zap SQUIDs, since that's what got us into this.
1110 Still railed at these weird values. Unpower DCRCs.
1130 Disable DCRC1 in ODB. Repower DCRC3, and look at pulses. HV2 pC & pD are railed at expected values. Adjusting Driver Offset brings them to showing pulses. Zap SQUIDs to see if we can reproduce the issue.
1145 After unrailing the two channels by adjusting Driver Offset, HV2 pC & pD still showing pulses. Looks like the power cycling did the trick. No to apply bias.
1200 Tested first 150mm LED board. Using LED test mode of multimeter. They seem to have survived the soldering process, huzzah!
OffUV onIR on

1205 Applying HV bias to crystal produced the following results:
HV (V) Leakage (mV) Baseline pC (V) Baseline pD (V)
0.001 0.1 -0.435 -0.638
5.002 3.6 → 1.3 -.315 -0.518
7.51 2.9 → 1.2 0.051 -0.131
Note: At 7.51V the pulses disappeared on both phonon channels. After ~10 minutes at this voltage,
minor bumps could be seen on HV2 pD, though no pulses actually broke through the white noise.
1230 Lower HV back to 0, and unpower DCRC3.
1357 Only DIB 2 connected, no switchboard. Looking more closely at heating.
HV (V) Leakage (mV) MC (mK) Tower (mK)
0.001 0.1 45.3 46.8
5.000 7 → 1.6 45.4 46.5
10.01 12 → 11.5 45.2 46.3
15.01 24 → 27 45.1 46.6
20.00 38 → 38 45.2 46.5
25.00 49 45.2 46.7
30.00 56 → 58 45.1 46.7
35.01 63 45.3 46.7
40.01 75 45.3 46.6
Now it seems we can't get DIB2 to cause heating… We saw heating the other day when everything was left floating except DIB2 PB QET bias/ret. Let's try to repeat that.
Only DIB2 connected with switchboard, all lines off except PB QET bias/ret.
HV (V) Leakage (mV) MC (mK) Tower (mK)
-0.004 0.0 43.5 46.7
5.01 7→1.6 43.6 46.9
10.01 10→5.3 43.4 46.7
15.01 11→5.2 43.6 46.8
20.00 14→12→15 43.5 47.7
25.00 24→25.6 43.8 49.6
30.01 35.6→37→34 44.2 50.9→51.1→50.3*
35.03 43.4→45 44.3 52.1→51.7*
30.00 33.0→33.8 44.3 50.8*
0.009 -19 44.0 47.0
35.02 60→43.6 44.0 51.5*

*Unstable +/- 0.5mK

So it seems we can cause heating by biasing a single set of QET bias/return lines, but allowing other channels to be connected as well increases leakage, but without heating.
1700 Fill LN2 cold trap full.

Next Day