UMN CDMS Wiki archive
start › cdms › k100 › group_meetings › 20200305
Teleconference link: https://fnal.zoom.us/j/9082275310
Domestic: 1-646-558-8656 (US toll)
Domestic: 1-408-638-0968 (US toll)
Access code: 908-227-5310
  • Lab Updates
    • 1K Pot running warmer than usual this run, probably some ice in it but not enough to prevent cooling to base
      • base 52-55 mK, not as good as usual but still can take data
    • Built the lead shield, which makes it much easier to see the 14keV and 18keV peaks
    • Taking drifted HV data. Nominal best noise width (PTOF) is around 34 eV, no clear improvement over Run 70 (before etching)
    • One mystery solved: this run and Run 70, relative calibration showed most channels very unbalanced (factors of 7 and 15). Turns out the OF time window was too restrictive for most channels. This has been corrected. (Should reprocess Run 70.)
    • One outstanding mystery: when we estimate Luke gain from calibrated data, the implied bias is much less than what we calculate the effective bias at the detector should be – from applied HV and corrections due to leakage current (<1%), detector charge buildup during biasing (~10%), and loss across the gap (~33%). The apparent Luke gain suggests a bias only 40% of what we calculate it should be. Nominal calculation assumes 1mm gap, it's actually smaller so bias should be even higher. It would make sense if the gap were 3 mm but no way it's that big. Calculation uses Ge dielectric constant of 16.2, it may be lower at sub-K temperature but that would predict a somewhat higher bias.
    • Currently scanning over biases (positive polarity, will switch to negative later).
    • After the bias scan data we'll try moving the source.
  • FNAL Update on DD Generator visit
  • Short update on simulated data processing
  • General Updates
  • Hongguang: the problem with Am241 validation